connectExample_004 - UFO Research
Executive Summary
Case Overview: This comprehensive UFO investigation examines unexplained aerial phenomena through multiple evidentiary sources and analytical methodologies.
Key Findings
- Primary Evidence: Comprehensive evidentiary analysis and documentation
- Witness Credibility: Assessed based on available evidence and witness credibility
- Official Response: Varies by case - official and civilian investigations
- Scientific Analysis: Multidisciplinary scientific approach and peer review
Incident Overview
connectExample_004 - UFO Research
Executive Summary
Case Overview: This comprehensive UFO investigation examines unexplained aerial phenomena through multiple evidentiary sources and analytical methodologies.
Key Findings
- Primary Evidence: Comprehensive evidentiary analysis and documentation
- Witness Credibility: Assessed based on available evidence and witness credibility
- Official Response: Varies by case - official and civilian investigations
- Scientific Analysis: Multidisciplinary scientific approach and peer review
Incident Overview
# socks examples When people ask about unexplained aircraft sightings, this case often comes up. ## Example for SOCKS 'connect' command The connect command is the most common use-case for a SOCKS proxy. This establishes a direct connection to a destination host through a proxy server. The destination host only has knowledge of the proxy server connecting to it and does not know about the origin client (you). ### Related Questions People Ask Many researchers wonder about the long-term implications of such well-documented aerial phenomena encounters. **Origin Client (you) <-> Proxy Server <-> Destination Server** In this example, we are connecting to a web server on port 80, and sending a very basic HTTP request to receive a response. It's worth noting that there are many socks-http-agents that can be used with the node http module (and libraries such as request.js) to make this easier. This HTTP request is used as a simple example. The 'connect' command can be used via the SocksClient.createConnection() factory function as well as by creating a SocksClient instance and using event handlers. ### Using createConnection with async/await Since SocksClient.createConnection returns a Promise, we can easily use async/await for flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { host: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; async function start() { try { const info = await SocksClient.createConnection(options); console.log(info.socket); //(this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } catch (err) { // Handle errors } } start(); ``` ### Using createConnection with Promises ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options) .then(info => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }) .catch(err => { // handle errors }); ``` ### Using createConnection with callbacks SocksClient.createConnection() optionally accepts a callback function as a second parameter. **Note:** If a callback function is provided, a Promise is still returned from the function, but the promise will always resolve regardless of if there was en error. (tldr: Do not mix callbacks and Promises). ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options, (err, info) => { if (err) { // handle errors } else { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } }) ``` ### Using event handlers SocksClient also supports instance creation of a SocksClient. This allows for event based flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; const client = new SocksClient(options); client.on('established', (info) => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }); // Failed to establish proxy connection to destination. client.on('error', () => { // Handle errors }); ``` This case continues to generate significant interest among researchers and represents an important data point in modern Unidentified Aerial occurrence studies. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What happened during the ufo incident? The ufo incident involved multiple witnesses reporting unusual aerial phenomena with characteristics that defied conventional explanation. ### Is the ufo incident credible? The credibility of this ufo incident is supported by multiple independent witness accounts and official acknowledgment. ### Has the ufo incident been debunked? Current analysis of this ufo incident continues to yield important insights for researchers studying unexplained aerial phenomena. ### Why is the ufo incident significant? This ufo incident is significant due to the quality of witness testimony, physical evidence, and official documentation involved. ### How was the ufo incident investigated? The ufo incident was investigated using standard protocols for aerial phenomena, including witness interviews and evidence analysis. ## Case Significance This incident remains noteworthy within the field of aerial phenomena research due to its documentation quality and witness testimony consistency. The case continues to inform current understanding of unexplained aircraft encounters and investigative best practices.
Witness Testimony Documentation
Primary Witness Accounts
Detailed documentation of primary witness testimonies, including background verification and credibility assessment.
Corroborating Witnesses
Additional witness accounts that support and corroborate the primary testimony.
Credibility Assessment
Professional evaluation of witness reliability based on background, expertise, and consistency of accounts.
Technical Evidence Analysis
Technical Evidence Collection
Comprehensive analysis of technological evidence including radar data, photographic analysis, and electromagnetic measurements.
Scientific Measurements
Quantitative analysis of physical phenomena including radiation levels, electromagnetic signatures, and atmospheric disturbances.
Government Investigation & Response
Official Investigation
Documentation of government and military investigation procedures and findings.
Classification & Disclosure
Current classification status and public disclosure of government-held information.
Expert Analysis & Scientific Evaluation
Expert Evaluations
Analysis and opinions from qualified experts in relevant fields including aerospace, physics, and psychology.
Peer Review Process
Academic and scientific peer review of evidence and conclusions.
Historical Context & Significance
Historical Significance
Analysis of this case within the broader context of UFO research and disclosure history.
Cultural & Scientific Impact
Influence on public perception, scientific research, and policy development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes this UFO case significant?
This case is significant due to its credible witness testimony, supporting evidence, and thorough documentation that meets rigorous investigative standards.
What evidence supports the witness accounts?
The case is supported by multiple forms of evidence including witness testimony, technical data, and official documentation that corroborate the reported phenomena.
How credible are the witnesses in this case?
Witness credibility has been thoroughly evaluated based on professional background, consistency of accounts, and corroborating evidence.
What was the official government response?
Government response included formal investigation, documentation, and varying levels of public disclosure depending on classification status.
Has this case been scientifically analyzed?
Yes, this case has undergone scientific analysis using appropriate methodologies for the available evidence and phenomena reported.
How does this case compare to other UFO incidents?
This case fits within established patterns of UFO phenomena while maintaining unique characteristics that distinguish it from other incidents.
What conventional explanations have been considered?
Conventional explanations have been thoroughly evaluated and eliminated based on the evidence and characteristics of the reported phenomena.
What is the current status of this investigation?
The investigation status reflects the most current available information and ongoing research into the documented phenomena.
Conclusion & Assessment
Case Assessment Summary
Based on comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, witness testimony, and expert evaluation, this case represents a significant contribution to UFO research and documentation.
References & Documentation
Official Documentation
- Government investigation reports
- Military incident documentation
- Aviation safety reports
- Scientific analysis papers
Research Sources
- Academic publications
- Expert interviews
- Peer-reviewed analysis
- Historical documentation
Original Documentation
# socks examples When people ask about unexplained aircraft sightings, this case often comes up. ## Example for SOCKS 'connect' command The connect command is the most common use-case for a SOCKS proxy. This establishes a direct connection to a destination host through a proxy server. The destination host only has knowledge of the proxy server connecting to it and does not know about the origin client (you). ### Related Questions People Ask Many researchers wonder about the long-term implications of such well-documented aerial phenomena encounters. **Origin Client (you) <-> Proxy Server <-> Destination Server** In this example, we are connecting to a web server on port 80, and sending a very basic HTTP request to receive a response. It's worth noting that there are many socks-http-agents that can be used with the node http module (and libraries such as request.js) to make this easier. This HTTP request is used as a simple example. The 'connect' command can be used via the SocksClient.createConnection() factory function as well as by creating a SocksClient instance and using event handlers. ### Using createConnection with async/await Since SocksClient.createConnection returns a Promise, we can easily use async/await for flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { host: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; async function start() { try { const info = await SocksClient.createConnection(options); console.log(info.socket); //(this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } catch (err) { // Handle errors } } start(); ``` ### Using createConnection with Promises ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options) .then(info => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }) .catch(err => { // handle errors }); ``` ### Using createConnection with callbacks SocksClient.createConnection() optionally accepts a callback function as a second parameter. **Note:** If a callback function is provided, a Promise is still returned from the function, but the promise will always resolve regardless of if there was en error. (tldr: Do not mix callbacks and Promises). ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options, (err, info) => { if (err) { // handle errors } else { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } }) ``` ### Using event handlers SocksClient also supports instance creation of a SocksClient. This allows for event based flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; const client = new SocksClient(options); client.on('established', (info) => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }); // Failed to establish proxy connection to destination. client.on('error', () => { // Handle errors }); ``` This case continues to generate significant interest among researchers and represents an important data point in modern Unidentified Aerial occurrence studies. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What happened during the ufo incident? The ufo incident involved multiple witnesses reporting unusual aerial phenomena with characteristics that defied conventional explanation. ### Is the ufo incident credible? The credibility of this ufo incident is supported by multiple independent witness accounts and official acknowledgment. ### Has the ufo incident been debunked? Current analysis of this ufo incident continues to yield important insights for researchers studying unexplained aerial phenomena. ### Why is the ufo incident significant? This ufo incident is significant due to the quality of witness testimony, physical evidence, and official documentation involved. ### How was the ufo incident investigated? The ufo incident was investigated using standard protocols for aerial phenomena, including witness interviews and evidence analysis. ## Case Significance This incident remains noteworthy within the field of aerial phenomena research due to its documentation quality and witness testimony consistency. The case continues to inform current understanding of unexplained aircraft encounters and investigative best practices.
Witness Testimony Documentation
Primary Witness Accounts
Detailed documentation of primary witness testimonies, including background verification and credibility assessment.
Corroborating Witnesses
Additional witness accounts that support and corroborate the primary testimony.
Credibility Assessment
Professional evaluation of witness reliability based on background, expertise, and consistency of accounts.
Technical Evidence Analysis
Technical Evidence Collection
Comprehensive analysis of technological evidence including radar data, photographic analysis, and electromagnetic measurements.
Scientific Measurements
Quantitative analysis of physical phenomena including radiation levels, electromagnetic signatures, and atmospheric disturbances.
Government Investigation & Response
Official Investigation
Documentation of government and military investigation procedures and findings.
Classification & Disclosure
Current classification status and public disclosure of government-held information.
Expert Analysis & Scientific Evaluation
Expert Evaluations
Analysis and opinions from qualified experts in relevant fields including aerospace, physics, and psychology.
Peer Review Process
Academic and scientific peer review of evidence and conclusions.
Historical Context & Significance
Historical Significance
Analysis of this case within the broader context of UFO research and disclosure history.
Cultural & Scientific Impact
Influence on public perception, scientific research, and policy development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes this UFO case significant?
This case is significant due to its credible witness testimony, supporting evidence, and thorough documentation that meets rigorous investigative standards.
What evidence supports the witness accounts?
The case is supported by multiple forms of evidence including witness testimony, technical data, and official documentation that corroborate the reported phenomena.
How credible are the witnesses in this case?
Witness credibility has been thoroughly evaluated based on professional background, consistency of accounts, and corroborating evidence.
What was the official government response?
Government response included formal investigation, documentation, and varying levels of public disclosure depending on classification status.
Has this case been scientifically analyzed?
Yes, this case has undergone scientific analysis using appropriate methodologies for the available evidence and phenomena reported.
How does this case compare to other UFO incidents?
This case fits within established patterns of UFO phenomena while maintaining unique characteristics that distinguish it from other incidents.
What conventional explanations have been considered?
Conventional explanations have been thoroughly evaluated and eliminated based on the evidence and characteristics of the reported phenomena.
What is the current status of this investigation?
The investigation status reflects the most current available information and ongoing research into the documented phenomena.
Conclusion & Assessment
Case Assessment Summary
Based on comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, witness testimony, and expert evaluation, this case represents a significant contribution to UFO research and documentation.
References & Documentation
Official Documentation
- Government investigation reports
- Military incident documentation
- Aviation safety reports
- Scientific analysis papers
Research Sources
- Academic publications
- Expert interviews
- Peer-reviewed analysis
- Historical documentation
Original Documentation
connectExample_004 - UFO Research
Executive Summary
Case Overview: This comprehensive UFO investigation examines unexplained aerial phenomena through multiple evidentiary sources and analytical methodologies.
Key Findings
- Primary Evidence: Comprehensive evidentiary analysis and documentation
- Witness Credibility: Assessed based on available evidence and witness credibility
- Official Response: Varies by case - official and civilian investigations
- Scientific Analysis: Multidisciplinary scientific approach and peer review
Incident Overview
# socks examples When people ask about unexplained aircraft sightings, this case often comes up. ## Example for SOCKS 'connect' command The connect command is the most common use-case for a SOCKS proxy. This establishes a direct connection to a destination host through a proxy server. The destination host only has knowledge of the proxy server connecting to it and does not know about the origin client (you). ### Related Questions People Ask Many researchers wonder about the long-term implications of such well-documented aerial phenomena encounters. **Origin Client (you) <-> Proxy Server <-> Destination Server** In this example, we are connecting to a web server on port 80, and sending a very basic HTTP request to receive a response. It's worth noting that there are many socks-http-agents that can be used with the node http module (and libraries such as request.js) to make this easier. This HTTP request is used as a simple example. The 'connect' command can be used via the SocksClient.createConnection() factory function as well as by creating a SocksClient instance and using event handlers. ### Using createConnection with async/await Since SocksClient.createConnection returns a Promise, we can easily use async/await for flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { host: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; async function start() { try { const info = await SocksClient.createConnection(options); console.log(info.socket); //(this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } catch (err) { // Handle errors } } start(); ``` ### Using createConnection with Promises ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options) .then(info => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }) .catch(err => { // handle errors }); ``` ### Using createConnection with callbacks SocksClient.createConnection() optionally accepts a callback function as a second parameter. **Note:** If a callback function is provided, a Promise is still returned from the function, but the promise will always resolve regardless of if there was en error. (tldr: Do not mix callbacks and Promises). ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options, (err, info) => { if (err) { // handle errors } else { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } }) ``` ### Using event handlers SocksClient also supports instance creation of a SocksClient. This allows for event based flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; const client = new SocksClient(options); client.on('established', (info) => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }); // Failed to establish proxy connection to destination. client.on('error', () => { // Handle errors }); ``` This case continues to generate significant interest among researchers and represents an important data point in modern Unidentified Aerial occurrence studies. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What happened during the ufo incident? The ufo incident involved multiple witnesses reporting unusual aerial phenomena with characteristics that defied conventional explanation. ### Is the ufo incident credible? The credibility of this ufo incident is supported by multiple independent witness accounts and official acknowledgment. ### Has the ufo incident been debunked? Current analysis of this ufo incident continues to yield important insights for researchers studying unexplained aerial phenomena. ### Why is the ufo incident significant? This ufo incident is significant due to the quality of witness testimony, physical evidence, and official documentation involved. ### How was the ufo incident investigated? The ufo incident was investigated using standard protocols for aerial phenomena, including witness interviews and evidence analysis. ## Case Significance This incident remains noteworthy within the field of aerial phenomena research due to its documentation quality and witness testimony consistency. The case continues to inform current understanding of unexplained aircraft encounters and investigative best practices.
Witness Testimony Documentation
Primary Witness Accounts
Detailed documentation of primary witness testimonies, including background verification and credibility assessment.
Corroborating Witnesses
Additional witness accounts that support and corroborate the primary testimony.
Credibility Assessment
Professional evaluation of witness reliability based on background, expertise, and consistency of accounts.
Technical Evidence Analysis
Technical Evidence Collection
Comprehensive analysis of technological evidence including radar data, photographic analysis, and electromagnetic measurements.
Scientific Measurements
Quantitative analysis of physical phenomena including radiation levels, electromagnetic signatures, and atmospheric disturbances.
Government Investigation & Response
Official Investigation
Documentation of government and military investigation procedures and findings.
Classification & Disclosure
Current classification status and public disclosure of government-held information.
Expert Analysis & Scientific Evaluation
Expert Evaluations
Analysis and opinions from qualified experts in relevant fields including aerospace, physics, and psychology.
Peer Review Process
Academic and scientific peer review of evidence and conclusions.
Historical Context & Significance
Historical Significance
Analysis of this case within the broader context of UFO research and disclosure history.
Cultural & Scientific Impact
Influence on public perception, scientific research, and policy development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes this UFO case significant?
This case is significant due to its credible witness testimony, supporting evidence, and thorough documentation that meets rigorous investigative standards.
What evidence supports the witness accounts?
The case is supported by multiple forms of evidence including witness testimony, technical data, and official documentation that corroborate the reported phenomena.
How credible are the witnesses in this case?
Witness credibility has been thoroughly evaluated based on professional background, consistency of accounts, and corroborating evidence.
What was the official government response?
Government response included formal investigation, documentation, and varying levels of public disclosure depending on classification status.
Has this case been scientifically analyzed?
Yes, this case has undergone scientific analysis using appropriate methodologies for the available evidence and phenomena reported.
How does this case compare to other UFO incidents?
This case fits within established patterns of UFO phenomena while maintaining unique characteristics that distinguish it from other incidents.
What conventional explanations have been considered?
Conventional explanations have been thoroughly evaluated and eliminated based on the evidence and characteristics of the reported phenomena.
What is the current status of this investigation?
The investigation status reflects the most current available information and ongoing research into the documented phenomena.
Conclusion & Assessment
Case Assessment Summary
Based on comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, witness testimony, and expert evaluation, this case represents a significant contribution to UFO research and documentation.
References & Documentation
Official Documentation
- Government investigation reports
- Military incident documentation
- Aviation safety reports
- Scientific analysis papers
Research Sources
- Academic publications
- Expert interviews
- Peer-reviewed analysis
- Historical documentation
Original Documentation
# socks examples When people ask about unexplained aircraft sightings, this case often comes up. ## Example for SOCKS 'connect' command The connect command is the most common use-case for a SOCKS proxy. This establishes a direct connection to a destination host through a proxy server. The destination host only has knowledge of the proxy server connecting to it and does not know about the origin client (you). ### Related Questions People Ask Many researchers wonder about the long-term implications of such well-documented aerial phenomena encounters. **Origin Client (you) <-> Proxy Server <-> Destination Server** In this example, we are connecting to a web server on port 80, and sending a very basic HTTP request to receive a response. It's worth noting that there are many socks-http-agents that can be used with the node http module (and libraries such as request.js) to make this easier. This HTTP request is used as a simple example. The 'connect' command can be used via the SocksClient.createConnection() factory function as well as by creating a SocksClient instance and using event handlers. ### Using createConnection with async/await Since SocksClient.createConnection returns a Promise, we can easily use async/await for flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { host: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; async function start() { try { const info = await SocksClient.createConnection(options); console.log(info.socket); //(this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } catch (err) { // Handle errors } } start(); ``` ### Using createConnection with Promises ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options) .then(info => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }) .catch(err => { // handle errors }); ``` ### Using createConnection with callbacks SocksClient.createConnection() optionally accepts a callback function as a second parameter. **Note:** If a callback function is provided, a Promise is still returned from the function, but the promise will always resolve regardless of if there was en error. (tldr: Do not mix callbacks and Promises). ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; SocksClient.createConnection(options, (err, info) => { if (err) { // handle errors } else { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ } }) ``` ### Using event handlers SocksClient also supports instance creation of a SocksClient. This allows for event based flow control. ```typescript const SocksClient = require('socks').SocksClient; const options = { proxy: { ipaddress: '104.131.124.203', port: 1081, type: 5 }, destination: { host: 'ip-api.com', // host names are supported with SOCKS v4a and SOCKS v5. port: 80 }, command: 'connect' }; const client = new SocksClient(options); client.on('established', (info) => { console.log(info.socket); // (this is a raw net.Socket that is established to the destination host through the given proxy servers) info.socket.write('GET /json HTTP/1.1\nHost: ip-api.com\n\n'); info.socket.on('data', (data) => { console.log(data.toString()); // ip-api.com sees that the last proxy (104.131.124.203) is connected to it and not the origin client (you). /* HTTP/1.1 200 OK Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:47:51 GMT Content-Length: 300 { "as":"AS14061 Digital Ocean, Inc.", "city":"Clifton", "country":"United States", "countryCode":"US", "isp":"Digital Ocean", "lat":40.8326, "lon":-74.1307, "org":"Digital Ocean", "query":"104.131.124.203", "region":"NJ", "regionName":"New Jersey", "status":"success", "timezone":"America/New_York", "zip":"07014" } */ }); // Failed to establish proxy connection to destination. client.on('error', () => { // Handle errors }); ``` This case continues to generate significant interest among researchers and represents an important data point in modern Unidentified Aerial occurrence studies. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What happened during the ufo incident? The ufo incident involved multiple witnesses reporting unusual aerial phenomena with characteristics that defied conventional explanation. ### Is the ufo incident credible? The credibility of this ufo incident is supported by multiple independent witness accounts and official acknowledgment. ### Has the ufo incident been debunked? Current analysis of this ufo incident continues to yield important insights for researchers studying unexplained aerial phenomena. ### Why is the ufo incident significant? This ufo incident is significant due to the quality of witness testimony, physical evidence, and official documentation involved. ### How was the ufo incident investigated? The ufo incident was investigated using standard protocols for aerial phenomena, including witness interviews and evidence analysis. ## Case Significance This incident remains noteworthy within the field of aerial phenomena research due to its documentation quality and witness testimony consistency. The case continues to inform current understanding of unexplained aircraft encounters and investigative best practices.