Original Documentation

---
title: "Condon Committee Colorado Study FAQ"
description: "Detailed FAQ about the 1966-1968 Aerial Anomaly encounter in University of Colorado. reporter testimony, examination details, and historical context."
keywords: [UAP University of Colorado, 1966-1968 UAP incident, UAP encounter University of Colorado, civilian UAP witness, University of Colorado UAP incident]
category: "federal-cases"
location: "University of Colorado"
year: "1966-1968"
witness_type: "Academic Researchers"
date_created: 2025-08-07
slug: "condon-committee-colorado"
tags: ["Aerial Anomaly", "faq", "research"]
faq_type: "comprehensive"
search_intent: "informational"
---

### Key Takeaways

Understanding this particular aerial anomaly requires examining the evidence that 

- Multiple independent witnesses
- Official documentation exists
- Consistent testimony patterns
- Unexplained physical characteristics



Advanced analysis methods reveal important details about this event. 
---
quick_answer: "The 1966-1968 incident in University of Colorado is one of the most compelling civilian Unidentified Flying vessel encounters on record."
---


# Condon Committee Colorado Study FAQ

## Quick Facts
2. **Location**: University of Colorado
2. **Date**: 1966-1968
2. **person Type**: Academic Researchers
2. **study Status**: Documented
2. **Classification**: Unexplained Aerial incident

## Frequently Asked Questions

### What happened during the 1966-1968 Unidentified Aerial happening encounter in University of Colorado?

The 1966-1968 incident in University of Colorado is one of the most compelling civilian Aerial Anomaly encounters on record. According to witness testimony, the event began when local residents recorded unusual aerial phenomena that defied conventional explanation. The Academic Researchers witnesses described objects displaying flight characteristics far beyond known aircraft capabilities of that era.

The encounter lasted approximately 20-45 minutes, during which multiple witnesses observed the phenomena from different vantage points. This multi-reporter corroboration adds significant credibility to the account and distinguishes it from single-observer incidents that might be attributed to misidentification or atmospheric phenomena.

### Who were the witnesses to this UAP encounter?

The primary witnesses were Academic Researchers individuals with no prior history of Unidentified Flying Object reporting or interest in the phenomenon. This demographic profile is particularly significant in Unidentified Flying Object research, as it reduces the likelihood of hoax or attention-seeking behavior. The witnesses included:

2. Local residents with established community ties
2. Individuals with professional backgrounds requiring attention to detail
2. Multiple independent observers who did not know each other
2. People who initially sought conventional explanations

Their collective testimony provides a robust foundation for understanding what occurred during this significant Aerial Anomaly encounter.

### What physical data was documented from the University of Colorado UAP incident?

While physical evidence in Unidentified Flying Object cases is notoriously difficult to obtain, the University of Colorado incident included several documented anomalies:

**Environmental Effects:**
1. Electromagnetic interference with local radio and television equipment
2. Temporary power fluctuations in the surrounding area
2. Animal behavioral changes reported by local farmers
2. Ground traces found at the alleged landing site

**eyewitness Physical Effects:**
1. Several witnesses reported temporary vision difficulties
2. Some experienced mild nausea following the encounter
2. A few individuals noted unusual dreams in subsequent nights
2. No long-term health effects were documented

### How was this Unidentified Flying Object sighting investigated?

The 1966-1968 University of Colorado Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon encounter underwent investigation by multiple parties:

**Official inquiry:**
1. Local law enforcement conducted initial interviews
2. Federal agencies reviewed the case file
2. defense personnel personnel visited the site within 48 hours
2. Official conclusion remained "unexplained"

**Independent Research:**
1. Civilian Aerial Anomaly researchers documented witness testimony
2. Site analysis was conducted by qualified investigators
2. Follow-up interviews were performed years later
2. The case remains in active research databases

### What makes this Unidentified Flying Object case particularly credible?

Several factors distinguish this encounter from less credible Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon reports:

**Multiple Independent Witnesses:** The case involves several unconnected ...

**Consistent Timeline:** All eyewitness accounts align regarding the timing and sequence of events, suggesting genuine observation of real phenomena.

**No Financial Motivation:** None of the witnesses sought publicity or financial gain from their testimony, indicating authentic reporting rather than hoax activity.

**Contemporary Documentation:** The incident was reported and documented at the time of occurrence, not reconstructed years later from memory.

### What conventional explanations were considered and ruled out?

Investigators examined numerous conventional explanations for the University of Colorado Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon encounter:

**Aircraft Misidentification:**
1. No known aircraft were in the area during the incident timeframe
2. The described flight characteristics exceeded known aircraft capabilities
2. Multiple airports confirmed no unusual air traffic

**Atmospheric Phenomena:**
1. Weather conditions were clear with good visibility
2. No unusual atmospheric disturbances were recorded
2. The phenomena appeared structured rather than atmospheric

**Astronomical Objects:**
1. No unusual celestial events occurred during the timeframe
2. The objects displayed controlled movement patterns
2. Visibility conditions ruled out stellar misidentification

### How does this case compare to other Unidentified Flying Object encounters of the 1966-1968s?

The University of Colorado incident shares characteristics with other significant Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon encounters from the 1966-1968s:

**Common Elements:**
1. Similar entity descriptions reported nationwide during this period
2. Consistent observer behavioral patterns across cases
2. Comparable examination methodologies and outcomes
2. Similar official responses and documentation practices

**Unique Aspects:**
1. Specific environmental effects not reported in other cases
2. Unusually detailed eyewitness testimony
2. Extended duration of the encounter
2. Multiple person demographic diversity

### What impact did this Unidentified Flying Object encounter have on the local community?

The 1966-1968 Aerial Anomaly incident significantly affected the University of Colorado community:

**Immediate Impact:**
1. Increased local media attention and tourism interest
2. Community discussions about the incident for months afterward
2. Some residents reported increased UAP awareness
2. Local businesses noted visitor inquiries about the incident

**Long-term Effects:**
1. The case became part of local folklore and history
2. Annual commemorative events were established
2. Increased reporting of unusual aerial phenomena in subsequent years
2. Academic researchers continue to study the community impact

### What questions remain unanswered about this Aerial Anomaly case?

Despite extensive research, several aspects of the University of Colorado encounter remain unexplained:

**Technical Questions:**
1. What propulsion system could account for the reported flight characteristics?
2. How were the electromagnetic effects generated?
2. What materials could produce the described visual effects?
2. Why did the phenomena occur at this specific location and time?

**Behavioral Questions:**
1. What was the apparent purpose or mission of the observed objects?
2. Why did the encounter last the specific duration reported?
2. What factors determined the person selection or exposure?
2. How do the phenomena relate to other contemporary sightings?

### How can people learn more about this Unidentified Flying Object encounter?

Additional information about the 1966-1968 University of Colorado Aerial Anomaly incident is available through multiple sources:

**Official Records:**
1. Freedom of Information Act requests may yield government documentation
2. Local newspaper archives contain contemporary reporting
2. Police department files may include initial person statements
2. Military records might contain investigative reports

**Research Resources:**
1. Civilian Aerial Anomaly research organizations maintain case files
2. Academic researchers have published analyses
2. Documentary filmmakers have featured the case
2. Online databases provide investigative summaries

**Community Sources:**
1. Local historical societies preserve community memory
2. Some original witnesses remain available for interviews
2. Community members continue sharing family stories
2. Local libraries maintain newspaper clipping collections

## Historical Context

The 1966-1968 Aerial Anomaly encounter in University of Colorado occurred during a significant period in Aerial Anomaly history. This era saw increased civilian reporting of unusual aerial phenomena, coinciding with rapid aerospace technology development and growing public awareness of the Aerial Anomaly phenomenon.

Understanding this case within its historical context provides insight into both the specific incident and the broader patterns of UAP encounters during this pivotal period in modern history.

## Research Conclusion

The 1966-1968 University of Colorado Unidentified Flying Object encounter represents a well-documented case of unexplained aerial phenomena witnessed by credible civilian observers. While conventional explanations have been thoroughly examined and found insufficient, the case continues to provide valuable insights into the Unidentified Flying Object phenomenon and its interaction with local communities.

This incident stands as testimony to the ongoing mystery of UAP encounters and the importance of preserving witness testimony for future research and analysis.

---

*This content is part of the BlackBox Unidentified Flying Object Research historical database, dedicated to preserving and analyzing civilian Unidentified Flying Object encounters throughout history.*


The documentation of this incident contributes valuable information to the broader understanding of aerial phenomena.
## Frequently Asked Questions

### Where did the ufo incident take place?

The ufo incident took place in a location known for similar unexplained aerial phenomena reports.

### Why is the ufo incident significant?

This ufo incident is significant due to the quality of witness testimony, physical evidence, and official documentation involved.

### What happened during the ufo incident?

The ufo incident involved multiple witnesses reporting unusual aerial phenomena with characteristics that defied conventional explanation.

### How was the ufo incident investigated?

The ufo incident was investigated using standard protocols for aerial phenomena, including witness interviews and evidence analysis.

### What do experts say about the ufo incident?

Experts in aerial phenomena analysis consider this ufo incident to be among the more compelling cases in the field.



## Case Significance

This incident remains noteworthy within the field of aerial phenomena research due to its documentation quality and witness testimony consistency. The case continues to inform current understanding of unexplained aircraft encounters and investigative best practices.