1999 Illinois Police Ufo 003

---

title: "The Illinois Police Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Chase - January 5, 2000"

description: "Multiple police officers across several Illinois towns tracked a massive triangular craft, with radio communications and detailed sketches providing exceptional documentation of a Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon moving slowly at low altitude."

date: 2000-01-05

location: "Southwestern Illinois, USA"

coordinates: [38.6270, -90.1994]

type: "Multiple Police eyewitness Case"

witnesses: "At least 5 police officers and civilians"

duration: "Over 1 hour of observations"

tags: ["Illinois triangle", "police witnesses", "radio recordings", "slow moving craft", "Scott AFB"]

---

Updated research provides additional context for this encounter.

Summary

In the early morning hours of January 5, 2000, multiple police officers across several southwestern Illinois communities observed and attempted to track a massive triangular craft moving slowly at low altitude. Beginning with a civilian witness in Highland, Illinois, the sighting quickly became a multi-jurisdictional police matter as officers from Lebanon, Shiloh, Dupo, and Millstadt tracked the object. The craft, described as "the size of a football field" with bright lights at each corner, moved silently at speeds varying from stationary hovering to sudden acceleration. Police radio recordings, officer sketches, and consistent testimonies make this one of the best-documented police UAP encounters in history.

The Initial observation

Melvin Noll's Encounter

Around 4:00 AM:

• Melvin Noll, miniature golf course owner
• Returning from truck delivery
• Spotted bright light in northeast
• Thought it was bright star
• Light began moving toward him

First Close Observation

Noll described:

• phenomenon descended to treetop level
• "Like a two-story house"
• Multiple bright lights
• Elongated shape
• Completely silent
• Slowly moving southwest

Reporting to Police

At 4:10 AM:

• Noll drove to Highland PD
• Reported to dispatcher
• Initially met with skepticism
• Insisted officer investigate
• Dispatcher contacted St. Clair County

The Police Response

Officer Ed Barton

Lebanon Police Department:

• First officer to respond
• Initially skeptical
• Dispatched at 4:23 AM
• Thought individual "had a few"
• Changed mind upon experience

Barton's Observation

At approximately 4:28 AM:

• Spotted two bright lights
• Thought it was aircraft
• Lights suddenly converged
• Massive triangular shape revealed
• "Floating building" description

The officer reported:

• craft completely silent
• Moving very slowly
• Altitude 1,000-1,500 feet
• Headed toward Shiloh
• Radioed other departments

Multi-Agency Tracking

Officer David Martin

Shiloh Police Department:

• Heard Barton's radio call
• Positioned to intercept
• Waited in parking lot
• phenomenon approached position
• Best observation of event

Martin's Detailed incident

The Shiloh officer witnessed:

• Massive arrowhead shape
• "Size of football field"
• Three bright white lights
• Smaller red lights
• Completely silent
• Moving 15-20 mph

Most dramatically:

• phenomenon suddenly accelerated
• Traveled 8 miles instantly
• No sound of acceleration
• Impossible by known physics

Officer Craig Stevens

Millstadt Police Department:

• Alerted by radio traffic
• Positioned on Liederkranz Road
• Observed triangular vessel
• Confirmed other reports
• Made detailed sketch

Officer Matt Jany

Dupo Police Department:

• Southernmost observation
• phenomenon heading toward St. Louis
• Confirmed triangular shape
• Lost sight near Dupo

Physical Characteristics

Size Estimates

Officers consistently reported:

• "Football field sized"
• 75-300 feet per side
• Massive compared to aircraft
• Blocked out stars
• Dominated sky when close

Lighting Configuration

Common descriptions:

• Bright white light each corner
• Red/orange lights on bottom
• Some reported strobing
• Intensity varied
• Could dim or brighten

Structure Details

Officers noted:

• Dark surface between lights
• Appeared solid
• Some metallic reflection
• Geometric precision
• No visible engines

Flight Characteristics

Speed Variations

The phenomenon demonstrated:

• Hovering capability
• Slow 15-20 mph cruise
• Instant acceleration
• Covered miles in seconds
• Returned to slow speed

Altitude Changes

Witnesses observed:

• Low altitude approach
• Rose to higher altitude
• Descended again
• Maintained level flight
• No sound at any altitude

Maneuverability

Officers reported:

• Smooth directional changes
• No banking in turns
• Could stop instantly
• Reverse direction
• Defied physics

Radio Communications

Recorded Transmissions

Dispatch recordings captured:

• Real-time officer reports
• Inter-agency coordination
• Excitement in voices
• Professional conduct
• Detailed descriptions

Key Exchanges

Notable radio traffic:

• "Be advised there's a very bright light"
• "It's huge... triangular shape"
• "This thing's moving toward Shiloh"
• "I've got it in sight now"
• "It just shot away"

Scott Air Force Base

Proximity Question

The entity's path:

• Passed near Scott AFB
• Major military installation
• Home to important commands
• Air traffic control center
• Radar capabilities

Military Response

Scott AFB claimed:

• No radar contact
• No unusual activity
• No aircraft scrambled
• Nothing on their screens
• Standard denial

Suspicions

Officers wondered:

• How radar missed it
• Why no intercept
• Secret military craft?
• Cover-up in progress?
• Questions unanswered

Officer Sketches

Professional Documentation

Several officers drew:

• Detailed sketches
• Consistent shapes
• Light positions
• Size comparisons
• Flight paths

Sketch Consistency

Drawings showed:

• Triangular/arrowhead shape
• Three main lights
• Additional smaller lights
• Proper proportions
• Matching descriptions

observer Credibility

Professional Observers

The officers:

• Trained observers
• Credible professionals
• No prior Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon interest
• Risked ridicule
• Nothing to gain

Consistent Testimonies

Despite separate locations:

• Descriptions matched
• Timing correlated
• Path reconstructed
• Details aligned
• No coordination possible

research

National Coverage

The case attracted:

• Local media immediately
• National news coverage
• Documentary teams
• Unidentified Flying Object researchers
• Scientific interest

NIDS analysis

National Institute for Discovery Science:

• Interviewed all officers
• Analyzed radio recordings
• Reconstructed flight path
• No conventional explanation
• Published detailed report

Attempted Explanations

Blimp Theory

Some suggested advertising blimp:

• Wrong shape
• Too fast
• Silent operation
• Acceleration impossible
• No blimps in area

Military Aircraft

Classified craft proposed:

• Stealth technology
• Secret test flight
• Black project

Problems:

• Performance too advanced
• Populated area overflight
• Low altitude risky
• No admission ever

Mass Misidentification

Skeptics claimed:

• Misidentified aircraft
• Optical illusions
• Planet/star confusion

Contradicted by:

• Multiple trained observers
• Close range sightings
• Consistent descriptions
• Radio documentation

Physical Effects

Electronic Interference

Some officers reported:

• Radio static
• Spotlight malfunction
• Engine roughness
• Electrical anomalies
• Equipment issues

Physiological Effects

Witnesses experienced:

• Hair standing up
• Tingling sensations
• Adrenaline surge
• Lasting amazement
• No harmful effects

Similar Cases

Pattern Recognition

Illinois case similar to:

• Belgian wave (1989-90)
• Phoenix Lights (1997)
• Hudson Valley (1980s)
• Triangular craft theme

Police Unidentified Flying Object Encounters

Comparable incidents:

• Exeter, NH (1965)
• Portage County, OH (1966)
• Multiple officer witnesses
• Professional documentation

Media Coverage

Immediate Response

Local coverage included:

• TV news teams
• Newspaper reports
• Officer interviews
• Sketch reproductions
• Serious treatment

Documentary Features

Multiple productions:

• UAP Files
• Discovery Channel
• National Geographic
• Independent films
• Ongoing interest

Impact on Officers

Career Effects

The witnesses:

• Faced some ridicule
• Maintained professionalism
• Stood by accounts
• Continued careers
• Became Aerial Anomaly case celebrities

Personal Changes

Officers reported:

• Worldview shifts
• Increased sky watching
• Interest in event
• Certainty of experience
• Life-changing event

Scientific Analysis

Flight Path Reconstruction

Researchers mapped:

• Precise route
• Speed calculations
• Altitude estimates
• Timing correlation
• Impossible accelerations

Technology Implications

craft demonstrated:

• Gravity defiance
• Inertia negation
• Silent propulsion
• Instant acceleration
• Unknown physics

Legacy

Law Enforcement UFOs

Case influenced:

• Police reporting protocols
• Officer willingness to report
• Department policies
• Training acknowledgments
• Stigma reduction

Research Standards

Established benchmarks:

• Multiple observer importance
• Radio documentation value
• Sketch correlation
• Path reconstruction
• Time synchronization

Modern Relevance

Pentagon UAP Reports

Recent admissions validate:

• Unknown objects exist
• Military encounters common
• Technology beyond conventional
• Police sightings credible

Ongoing Mystery

Despite research:

• No explanation found
• entity origin unknown
• Technology unidentified
• Questions remain
• Truth hidden

Significance

Illinois case important because:

• Multiple police witnesses
• Radio documentation
• Consistent descriptions
• Professional sketches
• Flight path tracked
• Technology demonstrated
• Credibility unquestioned

Conclusions

The Illinois police Aerial Anomaly chase proves:

• Trained observers see unknowns
• Documentation captures reality
• Consistency validates experiences
• Technology exceeds known
• Mystery continues
• Disclosure needed

Whether the craft was:

• Secret military project
• Extraterrestrial vehicle
• Interdimensional visitor
• Unknown incident

The Illinois case stands as one of the best-documented police encounters with an unknown craft in UAP history. The combination of multiple trained observers, radio recordings, detailed sketches, and consistent testimonies creates an ironclad case that something extraordinary operated in Illinois airspace that January morning. The professionalism of the officers involved and their willingness to report what they saw, despite potential ridicule, provides a model for how such encounters should be handled and demonstrates that the UAP phenomenon deserves serious investigation by law enforcement and government agencies.

The documentation of this incident contributes valuable information to the broader understanding of aerial phenomena.