Summary
Beginning on September 3, 1965, the small town of Exeter, New Hampshire became the epicenter of one of the most significant UFO flaps in American history. The incidents began with teenager Norman Muscarello’s terrifying close encounter with a massive craft and escalated when police officers Eugene Bertrand and David Hunt witnessed the same object. Over the following weeks, dozens of credible witnesses reported similar sightings, prompting official investigations and national media attention. The case remains unexplained despite numerous attempts to debunk it.
The Initial Encounter
Norman Muscarello’s Experience
At approximately 2:00 AM on September 3, 1965:
- 18-year-old Norman Muscarello was hitchhiking home
- Walking along Route 150 near Kensington
- Noticed a bright light in a field
- Object suddenly moved toward him
The Terrifying Approach
Muscarello described:
- Huge object, estimated 80-90 feet diameter
- Bright pulsating red lights
- Absolutely silent
- Wobbling, “yawing” motion
- So close it filled his entire field of vision
In terror, Muscarello:
- Dove into a ditch
- Object hovered directly overhead
- Slowly moved toward a nearby farm
- He ran to a house, pounding on door
- No one answered
Race to Police Station
Muscarello flagged down a car:
- Couple drove him to Exeter police station
- Arrived around 2:25 AM
- Extremely agitated and frightened
- Desk officer noted his genuine terror
Police Investigation
Officer Bertrand Responds
Officer Eugene Bertrand had earlier investigated a similar report:
- Woman claimed UFO followed her car
- Bertrand found nothing
- Returned to station
- Heard Muscarello’s story
- Decided to investigate
Return to the Scene
At approximately 3:00 AM:
- Bertrand drove Muscarello back to area
- Initially saw nothing unusual
- Walked into field where sighting occurred
- Suddenly saw object rising from behind trees
The Officers’ Sighting
Bertrand later testified: “It was this huge, dark object as big as a barn. It had five bright red lights on it that pulsed in sequence, from right to left, then left to right.”
The object:
- Hovered about 100 feet altitude
- Swayed back and forth
- Moved slowly toward them
- Frightened nearby horses
- Dogs howled throughout area
Officer Hunt Arrives
- Bertrand radioed for backup
- Officer David Hunt arrived
- Also witnessed the object
- Watched it hover and maneuver
- Observed it for several minutes
- Object finally departed at high speed
Additional Witnesses
Earlier That Evening
Mrs. Christina Westmoreland:
- Driving home around 1:00 AM
- Object followed her car
- Bright red lights
- Silent operation
- Terrified, drove to police station
Simultaneous Sightings
During the police encounter:
- Ron Smith (telephone worker) saw lights
- Several residents called police
- Reports from multiple locations
- All described similar object
The Investigation Begins
Official Reports
- Bertrand and Hunt filed detailed reports
- Pease Air Force Base notified
- Project Blue Book informed
- Media quickly picked up story
Air Force Response
Major David Griffin and Lieutenant Alan Brandt investigated:
- Interviewed all witnesses
- Examined locations
- Took measurements
- Found no conventional explanation
The Pentagon Explanation
Initial Dismissal
The Pentagon suggested:
- Operation Big Blast (military exercise)
- High-altitude refueling operations
- Temperature inversion
- Advertising planes
Problems with Official Explanation
Officers Bertrand and Hunt wrote famous rebuttal:
- No aircraft in area at time
- Object far too large
- Movements unlike any aircraft
- Silent operation
- Duration too long for aircraft
Their letter stated: “What bothers us most is that many people are thinking that we were either lying or not intelligent enough to tell the difference between what we saw and something ordinary.”
Continuing Sightings
The Flap Intensifies
Following weeks brought:
- 60+ reported sightings
- Multiple police witnesses
- Daytime and nighttime encounters
- Various sizes and configurations
- Pattern of sightings along power lines
Notable Cases
September 15: Mrs. Virginia Hale
- Craft landed in field
- Left circular impression
- Witnessed by neighbor
October 1: Two police officers
- Chased object in patrol car
- Speeds exceeded 100 mph
- Object easily outdistanced them
Physical Effects
Electromagnetic Interference
Multiple reports of:
- Car engines stalling
- Radio interference
- TV disruption
- Electrical system failures
Animal Reactions
Consistent reports of:
- Dogs howling
- Horses panicking
- Cattle stampeding
- Unusual animal behavior
Media Coverage
Local Response
- Exeter News-Letter extensive coverage
- Manchester Union Leader investigation
- Boston newspapers picked up story
National Attention
- Saturday Review article
- Look magazine feature
- Network TV coverage
- International wire services
”Incident at Exeter”
Journalist John Fuller investigated:
- Interviewed 60+ witnesses
- Published book in 1966
- Became bestseller
- Brought worldwide attention
Scientific Interest
Atmospheric Physicist James McDonald
Investigated case in 1967:
- Interviewed key witnesses
- Found Air Force explanation inadequate
- Called it “one of the most significant cases”
- Criticized Project Blue Book handling
NICAP Investigation
National Investigations Committee found:
- Witnesses highly credible
- Multiple independent sightings
- No conventional explanation
- Physical effects documented
Debunking Attempts
Advertising Plane Theory
Skeptics suggested advertising plane:
- Wrong location
- Wrong time
- Size discrepancy
- Movement patterns different
- No planes in area
Weather Balloon
Air Force suggested weather balloon:
- Too large
- Wrong movement patterns
- Multiple witnesses discount
- Duration too long
Mass Hysteria
Difficult to support:
- Initial witnesses unaware of others
- Police officers trained observers
- Physical effects recorded
- Consistent descriptions
Long-term Impact
Police Procedures
Exeter influenced:
- UFO reporting protocols
- Officer training acknowledgment
- Documentation standards
- Multi-witness procedures
Witness Credibility
The case demonstrated:
- Police testimony weight
- Multiple witness importance
- Community credibility
- Media responsibility
The Witnesses Today
Norman Muscarello
Before his death in 2003:
- Maintained story accuracy
- Rarely discussed experience
- Never sought publicity
- Stood by account
Officer Bertrand
Throughout his life:
- Never wavered from account
- Frustrated by dismissals
- Proud of professional conduct
- Wished for serious investigation
Modern Analysis
Pattern Recognition
Exeter sightings showed:
- Concentration near water
- Power line proximity
- Consistent time patterns
- Similar flight characteristics
Technology Implications
Objects demonstrated:
- Silent propulsion
- Extreme maneuverability
- Electromagnetic effects
- Structured craft appearance
Significance
The Exeter incidents remain important because:
- Multiple credible witnesses
- Police officer involvement
- Extended time period
- Physical effects
- Inadequate official explanations
- Community-wide impact
Conclusion
The Exeter UFO incidents of 1965 represent one of the most thoroughly documented and credible UFO flaps in American history. Key factors include:
- Initial terrifying close encounter
- Police witness confirmation
- Multiple independent sightings
- Physical and electromagnetic effects
- Inadequate conventional explanations
- lasting impact on witnesses
Whether the objects over Exeter were:
- Advanced military craft
- Natural phenomena
- Extraterrestrial vehicles
- Something else unexplained
The case provides compelling evidence that structured, intelligently controlled craft of unknown origin operated over New Hampshire in 1965. The courage of witnesses like Norman Muscarello and Officers Bertrand and Hunt in reporting what they saw, despite ridicule, helped establish standards for UFO investigation that influence the field today. Exeter remains a benchmark case demonstrating that sometimes, extraordinary claims are backed by extraordinary evidence.