Summary
In the early morning hours of January 5, 2000, multiple police officers across several southwestern Illinois communities observed and attempted to track a massive triangular craft moving slowly at low altitude. Beginning with a civilian witness in Highland, Illinois, the sighting quickly became a multi-jurisdictional police matter as officers from Lebanon, Shiloh, Dupo, and Millstadt tracked the object. The craft, described as “the size of a football field” with bright lights at each corner, moved silently at speeds varying from stationary hovering to sudden acceleration. Police radio recordings, officer sketches, and consistent testimonies make this one of the best-documented police UFO encounters in history.
The Initial Sighting
Melvin Noll’s Encounter
Around 4:00 AM:
- Melvin Noll, miniature golf course owner
- Returning from truck delivery
- Spotted bright light in northeast
- Thought it was bright star
- Light began moving toward him
First Close Observation
Noll described:
- Object descended to treetop level
- “Like a two-story house”
- Multiple bright lights
- Elongated shape
- Completely silent
- Slowly moving southwest
Reporting to Police
At 4:10 AM:
- Noll drove to Highland PD
- Reported to dispatcher
- Initially met with skepticism
- Insisted officer investigate
- Dispatcher contacted St. Clair County
The Police Response
Officer Ed Barton
Lebanon Police Department:
- First officer to respond
- Initially skeptical
- Dispatched at 4:23 AM
- Thought witness “had a few”
- Changed mind upon sighting
Barton’s Observation
At approximately 4:28 AM:
- Spotted two bright lights
- Thought it was aircraft
- Lights suddenly converged
- Massive triangular shape revealed
- “Floating building” description
The officer reported:
- Object completely silent
- Moving very slowly
- Altitude 1,000-1,500 feet
- Headed toward Shiloh
- Radioed other departments
Multi-Agency Tracking
Officer David Martin
Shiloh Police Department:
- Heard Barton’s radio call
- Positioned to intercept
- Waited in parking lot
- Object approached position
- Best observation of event
Martin’s Detailed Sighting
The Shiloh officer observed:
- Massive arrowhead shape
- “Size of football field”
- Three bright white lights
- Smaller red lights
- Completely silent
- Moving 15-20 mph
Most dramatically:
- Object suddenly accelerated
- Traveled 8 miles instantly
- No sound of acceleration
- Impossible by known physics
Officer Craig Stevens
Millstadt Police Department:
- Alerted by radio traffic
- Positioned on Liederkranz Road
- Observed triangular object
- Confirmed other reports
- Made detailed sketch
Officer Matt Jany
Dupo Police Department:
- Southernmost observation
- Object heading toward St. Louis
- Confirmed triangular shape
- Lost sight near Dupo
Physical Characteristics
Size Estimates
Officers consistently reported:
- “Football field sized”
- 75-300 feet per side
- Massive compared to aircraft
- Blocked out stars
- Dominated sky when close
Lighting Configuration
Common descriptions:
- Bright white light each corner
- Red/orange lights on bottom
- Some reported strobing
- Intensity varied
- Could dim or brighten
Structure Details
Officers noted:
- Dark surface between lights
- Appeared solid
- Some metallic reflection
- Geometric precision
- No visible engines
Flight Characteristics
Speed Variations
The object demonstrated:
- Hovering capability
- Slow 15-20 mph cruise
- Instant acceleration
- Covered miles in seconds
- Returned to slow speed
Altitude Changes
Witnesses observed:
- Low altitude approach
- Rose to higher altitude
- Descended again
- Maintained level flight
- No sound at any altitude
Maneuverability
Officers reported:
- Smooth directional changes
- No banking in turns
- Could stop instantly
- Reverse direction
- Defied physics
Radio Communications
Recorded Transmissions
Dispatch recordings captured:
- Real-time officer reports
- Inter-agency coordination
- Excitement in voices
- Professional conduct
- Detailed descriptions
Key Exchanges
Notable radio traffic:
- “Be advised there’s a very bright light”
- “It’s huge… triangular shape”
- “This thing’s moving toward Shiloh”
- “I’ve got it in sight now”
- “It just shot away”
Scott Air Force Base
Proximity Question
The object’s path:
- Passed near Scott AFB
- Major military installation
- Home to important commands
- Air traffic control center
- Radar capabilities
Military Response
Scott AFB claimed:
- No radar contact
- No unusual activity
- No aircraft scrambled
- Nothing on their screens
- Standard denial
Suspicions
Officers wondered:
- How radar missed it
- Why no intercept
- Secret military craft?
- Cover-up in progress?
- Questions unanswered
Officer Sketches
Professional Documentation
Several officers drew:
- Detailed sketches
- Consistent shapes
- Light positions
- Size comparisons
- Flight paths
Sketch Consistency
Drawings showed:
- Triangular/arrowhead shape
- Three main lights
- Additional smaller lights
- Proper proportions
- Matching descriptions
Witness Credibility
Professional Observers
The officers:
- Trained observers
- Credible professionals
- No prior UFO interest
- Risked ridicule
- Nothing to gain
Consistent Testimonies
Despite separate locations:
- Descriptions matched
- Timing correlated
- Path reconstructed
- Details aligned
- No coordination possible
Investigation
National Coverage
The case attracted:
- Local media immediately
- National news coverage
- Documentary teams
- UFO researchers
- Scientific interest
NIDS Investigation
National Institute for Discovery Science:
- Interviewed all officers
- Analyzed radio recordings
- Reconstructed flight path
- No conventional explanation
- Published detailed report
Attempted Explanations
Blimp Theory
Some suggested advertising blimp:
- Wrong shape
- Too fast
- Silent operation
- Acceleration impossible
- No blimps in area
Military Aircraft
Classified craft proposed:
- Stealth technology
- Secret test flight
- Black project
Problems:
- Performance too advanced
- Populated area overflight
- Low altitude risky
- No admission ever
Mass Misidentification
Skeptics claimed:
- Misidentified aircraft
- Optical illusions
- Planet/star confusion
Contradicted by:
- Multiple trained observers
- Close range sightings
- Consistent descriptions
- Radio documentation
Physical Effects
Electronic Interference
Some officers reported:
- Radio static
- Spotlight malfunction
- Engine roughness
- Electrical anomalies
- Equipment issues
Physiological Effects
Witnesses experienced:
- Hair standing up
- Tingling sensations
- Adrenaline surge
- Lasting amazement
- No harmful effects
Similar Cases
Pattern Recognition
Illinois case similar to:
- Belgian wave (1989-90)
- Phoenix Lights (1997)
- Hudson Valley (1980s)
- Triangular craft theme
Police UFO Encounters
Comparable incidents:
- Exeter, NH (1965)
- Portage County, OH (1966)
- Multiple officer witnesses
- Professional documentation
Media Coverage
Immediate Response
Local coverage included:
- TV news teams
- Newspaper reports
- Officer interviews
- Sketch reproductions
- Serious treatment
Documentary Features
Multiple productions:
- UFO Files
- Discovery Channel
- National Geographic
- Independent films
- Ongoing interest
Impact on Officers
Career Effects
The witnesses:
- Faced some ridicule
- Maintained professionalism
- Stood by accounts
- Continued careers
- Became UFO case celebrities
Personal Changes
Officers reported:
- Worldview shifts
- Increased sky watching
- Interest in phenomenon
- Certainty of experience
- Life-changing event
Scientific Analysis
Flight Path Reconstruction
Researchers mapped:
- Precise route
- Speed calculations
- Altitude estimates
- Timing correlation
- Impossible accelerations
Technology Implications
Object demonstrated:
- Gravity defiance
- Inertia negation
- Silent propulsion
- Instant acceleration
- Unknown physics
Legacy
Law Enforcement UFOs
Case influenced:
- Police reporting protocols
- Officer willingness to report
- Department policies
- Training acknowledgments
- Stigma reduction
Research Standards
Established benchmarks:
- Multiple witness importance
- Radio documentation value
- Sketch correlation
- Path reconstruction
- Time synchronization
Modern Relevance
Pentagon UAP Reports
Recent admissions validate:
- Unknown objects exist
- Military encounters common
- Technology beyond conventional
- Police sightings credible
Ongoing Mystery
Despite investigation:
- No explanation found
- Object origin unknown
- Technology unidentified
- Questions remain
- Truth hidden
Significance
Illinois case important because:
- Multiple police witnesses
- Radio documentation
- Consistent descriptions
- Professional sketches
- Flight path tracked
- Technology demonstrated
- Credibility unquestioned
Conclusions
The Illinois police UFO chase proves:
- Trained observers see unknowns
- Documentation captures reality
- Consistency validates experiences
- Technology exceeds known
- Mystery continues
- Disclosure needed
Whether the craft was:
- Secret military project
- Extraterrestrial vehicle
- Interdimensional visitor
- Unknown phenomenon
The Illinois case stands as one of the best-documented police encounters with an unknown craft in UFO history. The combination of multiple trained observers, radio recordings, detailed sketches, and consistent testimonies creates an ironclad case that something extraordinary operated in Illinois airspace that January morning. The professionalism of the officers involved and their willingness to report what they saw, despite potential ridicule, provides a model for how such encounters should be handled and demonstrates that the UFO phenomenon deserves serious investigation by law enforcement and government agencies.