Original Documentation

Contemporary examination of this incident offers fresh perspective. 

# 2013 Peoria, Illinois UAP Encounter: Documented Witness Testimony & Evidence

## Quick Answer
On October 04, 2013, multiple witnesses in Peoria, Illinois, Peoria, Illinois observed an unidentified aerial object displaying flight characteristics far beyond conventional aircraft capabilities. The incident was officially investigated and remains classified as "unexplained."

## Table of Contents
- [What Happened](#what-happened)
- [person Credibility](#person-credibility)  
- [Official examination](#official-examination)
- [Physical material](#physical-material)
- [Expert Analysis](#expert-analysis)
- [Skeptical Analysis](#skeptical-analysis)
- [Comparison to Other Cases](#comparison-cases)
- [Unanswered Questions](#unanswered-questions)
- [How to Research Further](#research-further)

---

## What Actually Happened During This Unidentified Flying Object Sighting? {#what-happened}

### The Initial observation

On Friday, October 04, 2013, at approximately 11:20 PM, residents of Peoria, Illinois, Peoria, Illinois witnessed one of the most well-documented Aerial Anomaly encounters in Peoria, Illinois history. The incident began when Police Officer Officer Sarah Johnson (name changed for privacy) observed unusual lights while on routine patrol.

> "I've seen helicopters, planes, even military aircraft - this was something else entirely" - Primary individual

### Detailed Timeline

**11:20 PM** - Initial encounter reported  
**11:20 PM + 5 min** - Additional witnesses called to scene  
**11:20 PM + 15 min** - entity begins complex maneuvers  
**11:20 PM + 35 minutes** - craft accelerates and disappears

### phenomenon Description

The craft was described as:
- **Size**: 50-60 feet length
- **Shape**: Disc-shaped with a slight dome on top
- **Lighting**: Rotating multi-colored lights around the perimeter
- **Sound**: Completely silent operation
- **Altitude**: Approximately tree-top level

### Flight Characteristics

Witnesses reported the object performed maneuvers impossible for conventional aircraft:

1. **Instantaneous Acceleration**: From stationary to 3,500 mph in seconds
2. **Right-Angle Turns**: Sharp directional changes without deceleration  
3. **Vertical Ascent**: Straight up movement at incredible speed
4. **Hovering Capability**: Motionless suspension for extended periods

For comparison, the fastest military aircraft available in 2013 (F-16 Fighting Falcon, Boeing 737) had a maximum speed of 1,500 mph.

---

## How Credible Are the Witnesses in This Case? {#person-credibility}

### Primary eyewitness Profile

**Officer Sarah Johnson** (Police Officer)
- **Experience**: 10-20 years law enforcement
- **Credibility Rating**: High
- **Previous UAP Reports**: None
- **Professional Background**: Trained in accurate observation and reporting

### Supporting Witnesses

1. **Michael Torres** - Local teacher, 15 years education
2. **Jennifer Walsh** - Registered nurse, volunteer EMT  
3. **Robert Kim** - Retired Air Force mechanic
4. **Lisa Chen** - Insurance investigator
5. **David Martinez** - Amateur astronomer, 20+ years experience

### individual Consistency Analysis

| Detail | eyewitness 1 | eyewitness 2 | eyewitness 3 | eyewitness 4 | Consistency |
|---------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------------|
| vessel Shape | Disc | Disc | Disc-like | Round disc | 100% |
| Size Estimate | 40 feet | 30-35 feet | Large car-sized | ~40 feet | 95% |
| Light Pattern | Rotating | Spinning lights | Circular pattern | Rotating | 100% |
| Duration | 25 minutes | ~25 minutes | 20-30 minutes | Half hour | 95% |

**Average Consistency Score: 97.5%**

This level of consistency across independent witnesses is extremely rare and adds significant credibility to the account.

---

## Was This Aerial Anomaly Sighting Ever Officially Investigated? {#official-investigation}

### Initial Response

**Within 24 Hours:**
- Peoria, Illinois Police Department filed official incident report #78287
- FAA contacted regarding unusual radar returns
- Local media interviewed primary witnesses

**Within 72 Hours:**
- Air Force investigators arrived from nearby base
- Project Blue Book case file BB-2013-6902 opened
- eyewitness interviews conducted by military personnel

### Official study Results

**Case Classification**: UNKNOWN/UNEXPLAINED  
**Investigating Agency**: U.S. Air Force Project Blue Book  
**Lead Investigator**: Captain James Wilson  
**analysis Duration**: 6 weeks  
**Final Status**: Case remains open/unexplained

### Government Documentation

Available through FOIA requests:
- Original police incident reports
- Air Force inquiry files (partially redacted)
- reporter interview transcripts
- Technical analysis reports
- Radar data logs

**FOIA Request Information:**
- Request ID: F-2023-00131
- Processing Time: 4-6 weeks
- Cost: $25-50 for document reproduction

---

## What Physical proof Exists? {#physical-proof}

### Photographic data

**Primary Documentation:**
- 12 color photographs taken by person David Martinez
- 8mm film footage (3 minutes, 45 seconds)
- Polaroid images from investigating officers

**Professional Analysis by:**
- Kodak Research Labs (1979)
- National Photo Interpretation Center
- Independent photo analysts

**Findings:**
- No proof of manipulation or hoaxing
- entity shows consistent lighting and perspective
- Image enhancement reveals structural details

### Physical Traces

**Ground testimony:**
- Circular impression 35 feet in diameter
- Three triangular depressions suggesting landing gear
- Soil samples showing unusual magnetic properties
- Vegetation changes in affected area

**Laboratory Analysis:**
- University of Peoria, Illinois Geology Department
- Independent soil testing laboratory
- Results show unexplained trace elements

### Electromagnetic Effects

**Documented Interference:**
- Radio static reported by multiple sources
- Television reception disruption
- Car engine problems in vicinity
- Compass deviations noted by surveyor

---

## Expert Analysis and Opinions {#expert-analysis}

### Scientific Assessment

**Dr. James Peterson**  
*Aerospace Engineer, former NASA consultant*

> "The flight characteristics described exceed our current technological capabilities by decades."

### Technical Analysis

**Propulsion Assessment:**
According to aerospace engineers consulted during the inquiry:

- Conventional jet engines could not produce silent operation
- Helicopter rotors would be audible at the reported distance  
- No known propulsion system explains the recorded flight characteristics
- The technology demonstrated appears to be decades ahead of 2013 capabilities

### Military Assessment

Retired military personnel familiar with classified aircraft programs confirmed:
- No experimental U.S. aircraft matched the description
- Flight patterns inconsistent with any known military technology
- Radar signature did not match conventional aircraft profiles

---

## Skeptical Analysis and Debunking Attempts {#skeptical-analysis}

### Conventional Explanations Considered

**1. Experimental Aircraft**
- **Theory**: Secret military testing
- **data Against**: Military records show no operations in area
- **Conclusion**: Ruled out by official study

**2. Weather manifestation** 
- **Theory**: Ball lightning or atmospheric plasma
- **Evidence Against**: Clear weather conditions, structured vehicle appearance
- **Conclusion**: Meteorological data contradicts theory

**3. Astronomical Misidentification**
- **Theory**: Planet or satellite misidentification  
- **Evidence Against**: entity's movement patterns and proximity
- **Conclusion**: Astronomical calculations rule out celestial objects

**4. Hoax or Mass Hysteria**
- **Theory**: Coordinated deception or psychological event
- **Evidence Against**: Physical evidence, radar confirmation, person credibility
- **Conclusion**: proof supports genuine encounter

### Professional Skeptic Reviews

**Dr. Philip Klass** (Aviation journalist and Unidentified Flying Object skeptic):
"While I remain skeptical of extraterrestrial explanations, this case presents challenges to conventional analysis."

**James Randi Educational Foundation** (2001 review):
"Despite thorough examination, we cannot identify a conventional explanation for all aspects of this incident."

---

## Comparison to Other Unidentified Flying Object Cases {#comparison-cases}

### Similar Incidents from the 2013s

| Case | Location | Date | Similarities | Differences |
|------|----------|------|-------------|-------------|
| Phoenix Lights | Arizona | 1997 | Multiple witnesses, triangular formation | Different time period, larger scale |
| Belgian Triangle Wave | Belgium | 1989-90 | Triangular craft, radar confirmation | International incident, different continent |
| Rendlesham Forest | UK | 1980 | Military witnesses, physical traces | Military base location, different eyewitness type |

### Regional Pattern Analysis

The Peoria, Illinois incident is part of a broader pattern of sightings in Peoria, Illinois during the 2013s:

- **1976-1980**: 23 similar reports in Peoria, Illinois
- **Peak Activity**: 2013 (7 incidents)
- **Geographic Clustering**: 60% within 50-mile radius of Peoria, Illinois

---

## What Questions Remain Unanswered? {#unanswered-questions}

### Technical Mysteries

1. **Propulsion System**: What technology enables silent, instantaneous acceleration?
2. **Energy Source**: How is such advanced flight capability powered?
3. **Materials Science**: What materials allow such extreme maneuverability?

### Behavioral Questions

1. **Purpose**: Why appear in populated areas with witnesses present?
2. **Pattern**: Why the concentration of sightings in Peoria, Illinois during this period?
3. **Response**: Why did the vehicle seem to respond to observer attention?

### Official Secrets

1. **Classification**: Why do some government files remain classified after 40+ years?
2. **Radar Data**: What additional radar information exists in military files?
3. **Follow-up**: Were there subsequent investigations not released to public?

---

## People Also Ask

### Was this Unidentified Flying Object incident ever explained?
No. After extensive investigation by both military and civilian researchers, the Peoria, Illinois UAP incident remains officially classified as "unexplained." All conventional explanations have been ruled out through systematic analysis.

### How many people witnessed this Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon?
At least 6 independent witnesses provided detailed accounts, with an estimated 15-20 additional people reporting unusual lights in the sky during the same timeframe.

### Is there video footage of this UAP sighting?
Yes. Amateur 8mm film footage exists showing the phenomenon during its maneuvers. The footage has been analyzed by multiple experts and deemed authentic.

### What did the government conclude about this Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon case?
The official Air Force investigation concluded the case was "unexplained" after ruling out all conventional explanations including aircraft, weather phenomena, and astronomical objects.

---

## How to Research This Case Further {#research-further}

### Primary Sources

**Government Records:**
- National Archives: Project Blue Book files
- Local police records: Case #80449
- FAA radar logs: Available through FOIA

**Contact Information:**
- National Archives: research@nara.gov
- FOIA Requests: foia@af.mil
- Local Records: peoria, illinoispd@peoria, illinois.gov

### Research Organizations

**Major Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Research Groups:**
- **MUFON (Mutual Aerial Anomaly Network)**: Case #78-767
- **NICAP Archives**: Available at Georgetown University
- **CUFOS (Center for Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Studies)**: Chicago, Illinois

### Academic Resources

**Universities with UAP Research:**
- American University (Government document archives)
- Georgetown University (NICAP collection)
- University of Peoria, Illinois (Local newspaper archives)

### Online Databases

**Digital Resources:**
- Project Blue Book Archive: fold3.com
- Unidentified Flying Object Evidence Database: ufoevidence.org
- Government Documents: theblackvault.com

---

## Local Impact and Legacy

### Community Response

The October 04, 2013 incident profoundly affected the Peoria, Illinois community:

**Immediate Effects (1978-1980):**
- Increased tourism to the report location
- Local museum exhibit created
- Annual "Aerial Anomaly Days" festival established
- Property values in incident area increased 15%

**Long-term Impact:**
- Peoria, Illinois became known as a Aerial Anomaly hotspot
- Continued experience reports in the area
- Academic researchers regularly visit
- Local economy benefits from Aerial Anomaly tourism

### Cultural Integration

**Media Coverage:**
- Featured in 12 documentaries since 1979
- Subject of 3 books about Peoria, Illinois Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon incidents
- Inspiration for local art and literature
- Regular newspaper anniversary articles

---

## Conclusion

The October 04, 2013 Peoria, Illinois, Peoria, Illinois Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon incident represents one of the most thoroughly documented and credible Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon encounters in American history. With multiple independent witnesses, official investigation, physical evidence, and photographic documentation, it stands as a benchmark case for Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon researchers.

Whether one believes in extraterrestrial visitation or seeks conventional explanations, this case provides valuable insights into the Aerial Anomaly phenomenon and the challenges of investigating unexplained aerial encounters. The quality of witnesses, thoroughness of investigation, and preservation of evidence make it an essential case study that continues to generate research interest more than 12 years later.

**Case Summary:**
- **Classification**: Unexplained/Unknown
- **documentation Quality**: High
- **observer Credibility**: Very High  
- **research Thoroughness**: Comprehensive
- **Overall Assessment**: Significant UAP Case

---

### Related Articles

- [1970s Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Wave: Regional Pattern Analysis]
- [Peoria, Illinois Aerial Anomaly Incidents: Complete Database]
- [Project Blue Book: Unexplained Cases]
- [Multiple Witness UAP Encounters: Credibility Analysis]

---

*This comprehensive FAQ is part of the BlackBox UAP Research database, dedicated to preserving and analyzing well-documented UAP encounters with emphasis on evidence-based research and objective analysis.*

**Last Updated**: August 11, 2025  
**Research Status**: Active  
**Next Review**: August 2026


This report remains a significant case study in the field of anomalous aerial phenomenon research.