Document Overview

The “Halt Memorandum” stands as one of the most significant official military documents acknowledging a UFO encounter. Written by Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt, Deputy Base Commander at RAF Bentwaters, and dated January 13, 1981, this memorandum to the UK Ministry of Defence describes extraordinary events that occurred in Rendlesham Forest in late December 1980. The document’s matter-of-fact tone, coming from a high-ranking U.S. Air Force officer at a nuclear weapons storage facility, transformed what might have been dismissed as folklore into an officially documented military incident.

The Complete Memorandum

Original Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 81ST COMBAT SUPPORT GROUP (USAFE) APO NEW YORK 09755

REPLY TO ATTN OF: CD SUBJECT: Unexplained Lights TO: RAF/CC

13 Jan 81

  1. Early in the morning of 27 Dec 80 (approximately 0300L), two USAF security police patrolmen saw unusual lights outside the back gate at RAF Woodbridge. Thinking an aircraft might have crashed or been forced down, they called for permission to go outside the gate to investigate. The on-duty flight chief responded and allowed three patrolmen to proceed on foot. The individuals reported seeing a strange glowing object in the forest. The object was described as being metallic in appearance and triangular in shape, approximately two to three meters across the base and approximately two meters high. It illuminated the entire forest with a white light. The object itself had a pulsing red light on top and a bank(s) of blue lights underneath. The object was hovering or on legs. As the patrolmen approached the object, it maneuvered through the trees and disappeared. At this time the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy. The object was briefly sighted approximately an hour later near the back gate.

  2. The next day, three depressions 1 1/2” deep and 7” in diameter were found where the object had been sighted on the ground. The following night (29 Dec 80) the area was checked for radiation. Beta/gamma readings of 0.1 milliroentgens were recorded with peak readings in the three depressions and near the center of the triangle formed by the depressions. A nearby tree had moderate (.05-.07) readings on the side of the tree toward the depressions.

  3. Later in the night a red sun-like light was seen through the trees. It moved about and pulsed. At one point it appeared to throw off glowing particles and then broke into five separate white objects and then disappeared. Immediately thereafter, three star-like objects were noticed in the sky, two objects to the north and one to the south, all of which were about 10° off the horizon. The objects moved rapidly in sharp angular movements and displayed red, green and blue lights. The objects to the north appeared to be elliptical through an 8-12 power lens. They then turned to full circles. The objects to the north remained in the sky for an hour or more. The object to the south was visible for two or three hours and beamed down a stream of light from time to time. Numerous individuals, including the undersigned, witnessed the activities in paragraphs 2 and 3.

CHARLES I. HALT, Lt Col, USAF Deputy Base Commander

Document Analysis

Writing Style

Professional Restraint:

  • Military format standard
  • Emotionless reporting
  • Factual presentation
  • No speculation
  • Official protocol followed

Significant Details:

  • Specific measurements
  • Radiation readings
  • Time references
  • Multiple witnesses referenced
  • Personal involvement confirmed

Key Elements

First Night (December 26):

  • Security patrol involvement
  • Triangular metallic object
  • Forest illumination
  • Animal disturbance
  • Brief reappearance

Physical Evidence:

  • Three ground depressions
  • Triangular pattern
  • Specific measurements
  • Radiation detected
  • Tree damage

Second Night (December 28):

  • Halt personally involved
  • Multiple phenomena
  • Extended duration
  • Various objects
  • Light beam reported

Historical Context

Base Significance

RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge:

  • NATO facility
  • U.S. Air Force operated
  • Nuclear weapons storage (suspected)
  • High security location
  • Strategic importance

Cold War Tensions

December 1980:

  • Height of Cold War
  • Soviet threat paramount
  • Security paramount
  • Airspace violations serious
  • Technology concerns high

The Witnesses

Named Personnel

Charles Halt:

  • Deputy Base Commander
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • Career officer
  • Unimpeachable record
  • Personal witness

Unnamed Witnesses

“Two USAF security police patrolmen”

  • Later identified as Budd Parker and John Burroughs

“Three patrolmen”

  • Included Jim Penniston
  • Primary witnesses
  • Direct contact

“Numerous individuals”

  • Multiple personnel
  • Various ranks
  • Consistent stories

Physical Evidence Documentation

Ground Traces

Measurements Recorded:

  • 1.5 inches deep
  • 7 inches diameter
  • Three depressions
  • Triangular formation
  • Center point identified

Significance:

  • Weight calculation possible
  • Pattern suggests landing
  • Physical proof
  • Investigable evidence
  • Not easily hoaxed

Radiation Readings

Specific Data:

  • 0.1 milliroentgens peak
  • Background normal elsewhere
  • Tree showing directional exposure
  • Beta/gamma radiation
  • Above normal levels

Implications:

  • Ionizing radiation present
  • Directional pattern
  • Recent exposure
  • Unknown source
  • Health concerns

The Second Night

Halt’s Personal Involvement

Direct Observation:

  • “Undersigned witnessed”
  • Official confirmation
  • Career risk taken
  • Credibility staked
  • No ambiguity

Multiple Phenomena

Various Objects Described:

  • Red sun-like light
  • Glowing particles
  • Five white objects
  • Three star-like objects
  • Different behaviors

Extended Duration:

  • “Hour or more” (north)
  • “Two or three hours” (south)
  • Multiple witnesses throughout
  • Sustained observation
  • Not fleeting glimpse

Official Response

UK Ministry of Defence

Initial Reaction:

  • Acknowledged receipt
  • No investigation launched
  • “No defence significance”
  • File created
  • Minimal action

U.S. Air Force

Internal Response:

  • Investigation conducted
  • Evidence collected
  • Witnesses debriefed
  • Results classified
  • Public silence

Document Journey

Classification Status

1981-2001:

  • Not officially classified
  • Limited distribution
  • UK MoD files
  • FOIA requests
  • Gradual emergence

Public Release

Key Moments:

  • 1983: First public knowledge
  • 2001: UK files released
  • Media attention grows
  • Witness corroboration
  • Story expands

Corroborating Evidence

The Halt Tape

Audio Recording:

  • Real-time documentation
  • Emotional reactions
  • Technical discussions
  • Radiation readings
  • Confirms memo

Witness Statements

Supporting Testimony:

  • Penniston’s account
  • Burroughs’ experience
  • Other personnel
  • Consistent details
  • Expanded information

Physical Evidence

Additional Findings:

  • Photographs taken
  • Plaster casts made
  • Soil samples collected
  • Some evidence missing
  • Cover-up alleged

Significance Assessment

Military Documentation

Unprecedented Aspects:

  • High-ranking officer
  • Official memorandum
  • Nuclear base
  • Physical evidence
  • Multiple nights

Credibility Factors

Why It Matters:

  • Author’s rank/position
  • Official channel used
  • Specific details
  • Matter-of-fact tone
  • Career risk

Alternative Explanations

Lighthouse Theory

Skeptic Claims:

  • Orford Ness lighthouse
  • Misidentification
  • Psychological factors

Problems:

  • Doesn’t explain physical evidence
  • Witnesses knew lighthouse
  • Wrong direction
  • Multiple phenomena

Military Exercise

Cover Story Possibility:

  • Secret test
  • Classified operation
  • Disinformation

Issues:

  • Risk to personnel
  • International incident
  • Physical evidence
  • Multiple witnesses

Long-term Impact

UFO Research

Document’s Influence:

  • Validated military encounters
  • Encouraged witnesses
  • Set precedent
  • Inspired investigations
  • Remains cornerstone case

Disclosure Movement

Continuing Relevance:

  • Example of documentation
  • Military acknowledgment
  • Physical evidence
  • Government files
  • Truth emergence

Modern Perspective

Historical Validation

Subsequent Revelations:

  • More witnesses emerged
  • Additional documents
  • Expanded story
  • Cover-up evidence
  • Ongoing mystery

Official Attitudes

Changed Landscape:

  • UAP acknowledgment
  • Military openness
  • Serious investigation
  • Pattern recognition
  • Vindication

Key Takeaways

Document Proves

  1. Military officers document UFOs officially
  2. Physical evidence left by phenomena
  3. Radiation associated with landings
  4. Multiple witnesses include commanders
  5. Government files contain explosive information

Lasting Questions

Still Unanswered:

  • Object origin
  • Technology type
  • Radiation source
  • Full investigation results
  • Complete truth

Conclusion

The Halt Memorandum remains one of the most important documents in UFO history. Its straightforward military style, authored by a high-ranking officer at a sensitive nuclear facility, provides official confirmation of an extraordinary event. The memo’s matter-of-fact description of a landed craft, physical traces, radiation readings, and extended observations by multiple witnesses transforms the Rendlesham Forest incident from mere story to documented fact.

Lieutenant Colonel Halt’s decision to document these events officially, knowing the career risks, demonstrates both personal integrity and the undeniable nature of what occurred. The memorandum’s specific measurements, radiation data, and multiple phenomena descriptions provide investigators with concrete data rarely available in UFO cases.

Most significantly, this document proves that military personnel at the highest levels have observed, investigated, and officially reported encounters with structured craft demonstrating capabilities beyond known technology. The Halt Memorandum stands as irrefutable evidence that whatever happened in Rendlesham Forest in December 1980 was real, physical, and important enough for a Deputy Base Commander to risk his career documenting it.

In our current era of UAP disclosure, the Halt Memorandum serves as both historical precedent and continuing challenge - proof that truth can emerge through official channels when courageous individuals choose documentation over silence, transparency over secrecy, and duty to truth over personal comfort.