DECLASSIFIED CASE ID: CHILES-WHITTED-1948

Chiles-Whitted Encounter: Commercial Aviation UFO 1948

Two experienced Eastern Air Lines pilots encountered a cigar-shaped craft with multiple windows during a routine flight, providing one of the first detailed commercial aviation UFO reports.

The Chiles-Whitted Encounter: Commercial Aviation’s First UFO Case

Executive Summary

On July 24, 1948, Captain Clarence S. Chiles and First Officer John B. Whitted of Eastern Air Lines Flight 576 encountered an unidentified cigar-shaped aircraft during a routine flight near Montgomery, Alabama. The encounter, lasting 10-15 seconds, provided one of the most detailed early UFO reports from commercial aviation and became a foundational case for Project Sign, the U.S. Air Force’s first systematic UFO investigation program.

Flight Details and Background

Aircraft and Crew

Eastern Air Lines Flight 576

  • Aircraft: Douglas DC-3
  • Route: Houston to Atlanta via Montgomery
  • Date/Time: July 24, 1948, 2:45 AM CST
  • Altitude: 5,000 feet
  • Weather: Clear, unlimited visibility

Crew Credentials:

  • Captain Clarence S. Chiles: 8,500+ flight hours, WWII military pilot
  • First Officer John B. Whitted: 3,000+ flight hours, former military aviator
  • Both pilots: Described as experienced, reliable, and level-headed

Passenger Context

The DC-3 carried 20 passengers, most of whom were asleep during the night flight. Only one passenger, Clarence McKelvie, reported seeing a bright light streak past the aircraft.

The Encounter Sequence

Initial Sighting

At approximately 2:45 AM, while flying northeast toward Montgomery, both pilots simultaneously observed a bright light approaching head-on at high speed.

Initial observations:

  • Bright light appearing from the southeast
  • Approaching at their altitude (5,000 feet)
  • High rate of closure suggesting extreme speed
  • Object appeared to be on collision course

Close Encounter Phase

As the object approached, both pilots were able to observe detailed characteristics of what appeared to be an aircraft unlike any known design.

Detailed description:

  • Shape: Cigar or torpedo-shaped
  • Length: Estimated 100-200 feet
  • Color: Dark metallic with bright blue-white exhaust
  • Windows: Two parallel rows of lighted rectangular windows
  • Propulsion: Bright orange-red flame trailing from rear
  • Speed: Estimated 500-700 mph

Evasive Action

Recognizing the potential for collision, Captain Chiles banked the DC-3 sharply to the left while the unknown object simultaneously veered to its right (the aircraft’s left).

Sequence of events:

  1. Object approached head-on at high speed
  2. Both aircraft took evasive action
  3. Unknown object passed approximately 700 feet to the left
  4. Object continued northeast, climbing steeply
  5. Bright exhaust flame remained visible for several seconds
  6. Total observation time: 10-15 seconds

Witness Testimony

Captain Chiles’ Account

“It was about 100 feet long, cigar-shaped, and about twice the diameter of a B-29 fuselage. It was wingless. I saw two rows of windows, which indicated an upper and lower deck. They were very bright, like fluorescent lights. The exhaust was a red-orange flame with a lighter color predominating around the outer edges.”

First Officer Whitted’s Description

“I saw the same thing Captain Chiles described. It was definitely not a conventional aircraft. The windows were too bright and the shape was unlike anything I’ve ever seen. The exhaust flame was enormous - much larger than any jet aircraft I know of.”

Passenger Witness

Clarence McKelvie (Seat 10A): “I was looking out the window when this brilliant light streaked past us. It was much brighter than any aircraft lights I’ve seen, and it was moving incredibly fast.”

Physical Evidence and Effects

Aircraft Systems

Post-encounter inspection of the DC-3 revealed:

Findings:

  • No structural damage or unusual wear
  • All instruments functioning normally
  • No electromagnetic interference reported
  • Engine performance remained consistent
  • Radio communications unaffected

Atmospheric Disturbance

Both pilots reported feeling a slight atmospheric disturbance as the object passed:

Observed effects:

  • Minor turbulence in the wake of the object
  • Brief temperature fluctuation in cockpit
  • No unusual sounds over engine noise
  • Slight aircraft buffeting

Official Investigation

Project Sign Analysis

The Chiles-Whitted encounter became a priority case for Project Sign, receiving extensive investigation and analysis.

Investigation elements:

  • Detailed pilot interviews
  • Flight path reconstruction
  • Weather analysis
  • Aircraft identification checks
  • Radar confirmation attempts
  • Expert witness evaluation

Air Force Intelligence Assessment

Project Sign investigators conducted thorough analysis of the encounter:

Key findings:

  • Pilot credibility rated as excellent
  • No known aircraft matched the description
  • Speed and maneuvers exceeded conventional capabilities
  • Multiple windows suggested occupied craft
  • Exhaust characteristics inconsistent with known propulsion

Initial Classification

Project Sign initially classified the encounter as “Unknown” and included it in the famous “Estimate of the Situation” report that concluded some UFOs were of extraterrestrial origin.

Alternative Explanations Considered

Conventional Aircraft

Investigators examined whether the object could have been a known aircraft type:

Analysis results:

  • No civilian aircraft: Matched description or flight path
  • No military aircraft: Scheduled in the area at the time
  • Experimental aircraft: No known projects with reported characteristics
  • Foreign aircraft: No evidence of foreign intrusion

Meteor or Bolide

The possibility of a large meteor was extensively analyzed:

Evidence against meteor theory:

  • Controlled flight path: Object demonstrated controlled maneuvers
  • Consistent altitude: Maintained level flight rather than descending
  • Detailed structure: Windows and geometric shape incompatible with meteor
  • Duration: 10-15 seconds too long for typical meteor observation
  • Evasive action: Object appeared to respond to aircraft presence

Experimental Rocket

Investigators considered whether the object might have been an experimental rocket or missile:

Evidence against rocket theory:

  • Horizontal flight: No known rockets capable of sustained horizontal flight
  • Windows: Inconsistent with rocket or missile design
  • Maneuverability: Demonstrated controlled directional changes
  • Size: Larger than any known rocket of the era
  • Location: No rocket facilities or test ranges in the area

Technical Analysis

Performance Characteristics

Engineering analysis of reported maneuvers and characteristics:

Speed calculations:

  • Closure rate: Estimated 500-700 mph based on pilot observations
  • Maneuvering speed: Maintained high speed through directional changes
  • Acceleration: Rapid climb after passing aircraft
  • Comparison: Exceeded performance of any known 1948 aircraft

Propulsion Assessment

The reported exhaust characteristics were analyzed by propulsion experts:

Exhaust analysis:

  • Color: Red-orange flame consistent with chemical propulsion
  • Size: Disproportionately large for reported aircraft size
  • Intensity: Brightness exceeded normal jet exhaust
  • Duration: Maintained consistent flame during maneuvers

Conclusion: Propulsion system unknown and beyond contemporary technology.

Radar Analysis

Ground Radar Check

Air Traffic Control and military radar facilities were contacted to determine if the object was tracked:

Radar results:

  • Montgomery AAF: No unknown targets detected
  • Maxwell AFB: No unusual radar returns reported
  • Atlanta Center: No correlation with known aircraft
  • Limitations: 1948 radar coverage limited in rural areas

Radar Capability Context

1948 radar limitations:

  • Limited coverage at 5,000-foot altitude
  • Rural areas poorly covered
  • Weather interference common
  • Object size may have been below detection threshold

Intelligence Implications

Security Assessment

The encounter raised several national security concerns:

Strategic considerations:

  • Unknown aircraft operating in U.S. airspace
  • Technology superior to known capabilities
  • Potential foreign advanced technology
  • Commercial aviation safety implications

Classification Issues

The case created challenges for military intelligence:

Information control:

  • Civilian crew impossible to silence
  • Media attention from commercial aviation report
  • Need to balance security with public safety
  • International implications if foreign technology

Media and Public Response

Press Coverage

The encounter received significant media attention as one of the first commercial pilot UFO reports:

Coverage characteristics:

  • Treated seriously due to pilot credibility
  • Technical details widely reported
  • Comparison to other recent sightings
  • Public interest in aviation safety implications

Aviation Industry Response

The commercial aviation industry responded with mixed reactions:

Industry positions:

  • Pilot organizations: Supported crew credibility
  • Airlines: Concerned about passenger confidence
  • Regulators: Interested in aviation safety aspects
  • Manufacturers: No aircraft matched description

Historical Context

UFO Era Timeline

The Chiles-Whitted encounter occurred during the formative period of modern UFO history:

Timeline context:

  • June 24, 1947: Kenneth Arnold sighting
  • July 1947: Roswell incident
  • September 1947: Project Sign established
  • July 24, 1948: Chiles-Whitted encounter
  • October 1, 1948: Gorman Dogfight

Commercial Aviation Significance

The case marked the beginning of commercial aviation’s involvement in UFO reporting:

Significance factors:

  • First detailed commercial pilot UFO report
  • Established credibility precedent for pilot witnesses
  • Demonstrated UFO encounters across aviation sectors
  • Influenced Project Sign investigation priorities

Project Blue Book Reanalysis

Classification Change

When Project Sign became Project Blue Book, the case was reexamined:

Blue Book assessment:

  • Initial: Maintained “Unknown” classification
  • Later analysis: Attempted explanation as meteor
  • Final classification: Classified as “probably meteor”
  • Controversy: Explanation disputed by original investigators

Criticism of Blue Book Conclusion

The meteor explanation faced significant criticism:

Problems with meteor theory:

  • Flight characteristics: Inconsistent with meteor behavior
  • Duration: Too long for typical meteor
  • Structure: Windows and geometric shape unexplained
  • Maneuvers: Controlled flight path incompatible with meteor
  • Witness expertise: Pilots familiar with meteors disputed explanation

Modern Analysis

Contemporary Evaluation

Modern UFO researchers consider the Chiles-Whitted case one of the strongest early encounters:

Supporting evidence:

  • Excellent witness credibility
  • Detailed observations
  • Multiple corroborating witnesses
  • Professional aviation context
  • Extensive official investigation

Pattern Recognition

The encounter established patterns common to later UFO reports:

Characteristic elements:

  • Cigar or torpedo shape
  • Multiple windows or lights
  • Silent or nearly silent operation
  • Advanced propulsion system
  • Controlled flight maneuvers

Investigative Legacy

Documentation Standards

The case demonstrated the importance of immediate, detailed documentation:

Best practices established:

  • Prompt witness interviews
  • Technical flight analysis
  • Multi-agency coordination
  • Preservation of all evidence
  • Transparent investigation process

Aviation Reporting

The encounter influenced commercial aviation UFO reporting procedures:

Protocol development:

  • Standardized reporting forms
  • Pilot training on observation techniques
  • Coordination with air traffic control
  • Documentation preservation requirements
  • Safety assessment procedures

Conclusion

The Chiles-Whitted encounter remains one of the most significant UFO cases of the early modern era. The credibility of the witnesses, the detailed nature of their observations, and the extensive official investigation make this case a cornerstone of UFO research.

The object’s demonstration of flight characteristics far exceeding known 1948 technology, combined with the structured appearance suggesting artificial origin, established this case as strong evidence for the reality of unexplained aerial phenomena. The encounter’s impact on Project Sign and subsequent UFO investigation programs demonstrates its historical significance in government UFO research.

Despite official attempts to explain the encounter as a meteor, the evidence supports the original Project Sign assessment that the object represented unknown technology or phenomena. The case continues to challenge conventional explanations and remains relevant to modern UAP research, particularly in the context of commercial aviation encounters with unexplained objects.

The Chiles-Whitted case established commercial aviation as a crucial source of credible UFO reports and demonstrated that the phenomenon extended beyond military observations to civilian aviation operations.


Classification Note: This document incorporates information from Project Sign and Project Blue Book files declassified under Freedom of Information Act releases.

Research Status: Historical - Case remains active in research community with ongoing analysis of declassified materials and witness accounts.

Recommended Reading:

  • Project Sign Report No. 102 (Declassified excerpts)
  • “The UFO Evidence” by Richard Hall
  • Air Force Blue Book files - Case 108